Dr. Ch. Shashi Kumar1, Dr. B. Rami Reddy2, Dr. N. Phani Kumar3
1Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Deshmukhi, India- 508284.
2Hindu College, Guntur, India - 522033.
3Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Deshmukhi, India-508224
*Corresponding Author E-mail skch17@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this paper is to present some existence results of Krasnoselskii type in generalized Banach spaces for multivalued operators. We provide also an application to a Fredholm-Volterra type integral inclusions system and gives an example in support of our main result. 47H10, 54H25, 34B15 fixed point, generalized contraction multivalued operator, integral inclusion, Krasnoselskii’s theorem.
KEY WORDS: Krasnoselskii Theorem, Fredholm-Volterra.
Let
be a
nonempty set. A mapping
is
called a vector-valued metric on
if the
following properties are satisfied:
(a)
for
all
; if
, then
;
(b)
for
all
;
(c)
for
all
.
A set
endowed with a vector-valued metric
is
called generalized metric space. The notions of convergent sequence, Cauchy
sequence, completeness, open subset and closed subset are similar to those for
usual metric spaces.
We
denote by
the
set of all
matrices
with positive elements and by
the
identity
matrix.
If
,
and
, then,
by definition:
![]()
Notice
that we will make an identification between row and column vectors in
.
Let
be a
generalized metric space in Perov’s sense. For
with
for
each
, we
denote by
![]()
the
open ball centered in
with
radius
and by
![]()
the
closed ball centered in
with
radius
.
For the proof of the main results we need the following theorems.
Theorem
1 Let
. The
following assertions are equivalents:
(i)
is
convergent towards zero;
(ii)
as
;
(iii) The
eigenvalues of
are
in the open unit disc, i.e
, for
every
with
;
(iv) The
matrix
is
nonsingular and
(1.1)
(v) The
matrix
is
nonsingular and
has
nonnegative
elements;
(vi)
and
as
, for
each
.
Definition
1 ([29])
Let
be a
generalized metric space. A subset
of
is
called compact if every open cover of
has a
finite subcover. A set
of a
topological space is said to be relatively compact if its closure is compact.
Definition
2 ([23])
Let
be two
normed generalized spaces,
and
an
operator. Then
is
called:
i)
compact, if for any bounded subset
we
have that
is
relatively compact (or equivalently
is
compact);
ii)
complete continuous, if
is
continuous and compact;
iii)
with relatively compact range, if
is
continuous and
is
relatively compact.
For the
case of multivalued operators in a generalized metric space
we
recall some notions.
If
is a
multivalued operator then
![]()
is the
fixed point set of the operator
.
Let us
consider now the following sets of subsets of a metric space
:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
If
is a
normed space, then we denote:
![]()
![]()
Let (
be a
metric space and we define now the following generalized functionals:
(1) ![]()
![]()
where
is
called the gap functional between
and ![]()
In
particular,
(where
) is
called the distance from the point
to the
set ![]()
(2) ![]()
![]()
In
particular
is the
diameter of set ![]()
(3) ![]()
![]()
where
is
called the excess functional of
over
.
(4) ![]()
![]()
where
is
called the generalized Pompeiu-Hausdorff functional of
and ![]()
If
is a
generalized metric space with
,
defined as
![]()
then we
denote by
the
generalized gap functional on ![]()
We will
denote by
the
Pompeiu-Hausdorff functional, generated by
, for ![]()
We
define
as

The following lemma is well-known, see for example S. B. Nadler [10].
Lemma 1
Let
be a
metric space,
and
Then
for every
, there
exists
such
that
We have the following extension.
Lemma 2
Let
be a
generalized metric space,
and
Then
for each
, there
exists
such
that
![]()
Lemma 3
Let
We
suppose that there exists
such
that
(i) for
each
there
is
such
that ![]()
(ii)
for each
there
is
such
that ![]()
Then
If
is a
generalized metric space, with
, then
for
, we
will denote by
the
closure of
with
respect to
.
In this
framework, a set
is
said to be closed if and only if
Thus,
a set
is
closed if and only if for any convergent (with respect to
)
sequence
its
limit belongs to
.
We will
denote by
the
set of all nonempty and closed (with respect to
)
subsets of
.
Lemma 4
Let
and
. Then
iff
Definition
3 ([4])
Let
be a
generalized metric space,
and
be a
multivalued operator. Then,
is
called a multivalued
contraction
in the sense of Nadler if and only if
is a
matrix convergent to zero and
![]()
If
are
two generalized metric spaces, we recall that a multivalued operator
is
said to be:
lower
semicontinuos (briefly l.s.c.) in
if and
only if for any open
such
that
, there
exists a neighborhood
for
such
that for any
, we
have that ![]()
Theorem
2 ([28])
Let
be a
generalized Banach space,
a
nonempty closed bounded convex subset of
and
such
that:
(i)
with
completely
continuous and ![]()
a
generalized contraction, i.e. there exists a matrix ![]()
convergent to zero, such that
![]()
for all
;
(ii)
for
all
.
Then
has at
least one fixed point in
.
Theorem
3 ([16])
Let
be a
generalized Banach space and
.
Assume that the operators
,
satisfy
the properties:
(i)
, for
each
;
(ii)
is a
multivalued
contraction
mapping in Nadler’s sense
(iii)
is
l.s.c. and
is
relatively compact.
Then
has a
fixed point in
In this section we will prove Krasnoselskii’s type fixed point theorems in
generalized Banach spaces for multivalued operators.
Let’s consider the following system of operatorial inclusions:
(2.1)
where
,
,
,
,
,
,
such
that
for each ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
We define


and

where
and
.
The system (2.1) is equivalent to
![]()
where
and
.
Theorem
4 Let
be a
generalized Banach space,
and
,
,
,
,
,
,
satisfy
the following conditions:
(i)
for
each ![]()
(ii)
,
are
l.s.c and
, for
all
are
relatively compact;
(iii)
![]()
![]()
![]()
where
is
convergent to zero.
Then there exists at least one solution for the system (2.1).
Proof. We
apply the fixed point theorem of Krasnoselskii for multivalued operators to the
space
,
endowed with the vector valued norm
defined
by
![]()
The
operator
is
l.s.c. This follows from the fact that
,
and
are
l.s.c. From condition (ii) we obtain that
is
relatively compact, where
.
We have
to show that the operator
and
are
-
contraction (multivalued
-
contraction in Nadler’s sense). Using the assumption (iii) we get that



and



or equivalently,
![]()
![]()
for ![]()
Thus
is a
multivalued
-
contraction in Nadler’s sense.
The invariance condition is satisfied since
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
which guarantee that
![]()
![]()
![]()
Thus we have that
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
![]()
or equivalentely

Thus
Theorem 3 applies and guarantees the existence in
of at
least one fixed point for
.
The aim of this section is to present an application of Krasnoselskii’s type fixed point theorem in generalized Banach spaces for a system of integral inclusions.
Theorem
5 Let
(with
) be an
interval of the real axis and consider the following system of integral
equations:
(3.1)
for
, where
, for ![]()
We assume that:
(i)
,
,
,
,
and
are
l.s.c. and integrably bounded.
(ii)
,
and
are
measurable and integrably bounded.
(iii)
there exists a matrix ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
for
each ![]()
(iv)
![]()
![]()
![]()
(v)
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
with ![]()
Then,
there exists
such
that the system (3.1) has at least one solution
Proof. Let us
denote
,
,
and
we
define the multivalued operators given by
![]()
where
![]()
where
![]()
where ![]()
![]()
where
![]()
where
![]()
where ![]()
![]()
where
![]()
where
![]()
where
The
system (3.1) can be rewritten as a fixed point equation of the following form
![]()
where


and

where
![]()
![]()
![]()
Obviously
is a
solution for our integral inclusions system if and only if is a fixed point for
the operator ![]()
We need
to show that the multivalued operators
,
satisfy
the assumptions of Theorem 4. We shall prove that
and
are
multivalued
-
contractions in Nadler’s sense.
Let’s
denote
,
and ![]()
Then
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
It
follows that there are the operators
the
integrable selections for
,
and
such
that
![]()
![]()
![]()
Since
![]()
![]()
and
![]()
we obtain that there exists
![]()
![]()
![]()
such that
![]()
![]()
![]()
Then
the multivalued operators
defined
by
![]()
![]()
![]()
where
and
![]()
and
![]()
and
![]()
have nonempty values and are measurable.
Let
be
three integrable selections for
,
and
. Then
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
Let’s
define
,
and ![]()
It
follows that
,
,
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
denotes
the Bielecki-type norm on the generalized Banach space ![]()
We obtain that
![]()
In a similar way we get that
![]()
and
![]()
These inequalities can be rewritten in a vectorial form


We get that

where

Taking
large
enough it follows that the matrix
is
convergent to zero, and thus
and
are
multivalued contractions in Nadler’s sense. By Covitz- Nadler fixed point
theorem we get that
is a
fixed point for 
Let
with ![]()
The
operators
and
are
l.s.c. and
,
and
are
relatively compact.
We
show that we can choose
, such
that
![]()
We have to prove that
![]()
![]()
![]()
We have
to show that for each
implies
that
and
for each
and
implies
that
and
Let
, which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that ![]()
We will
denote by
the
supremum norm in
, where
![]()
It follows that
![]()
![]()
![]()
and
![]()
Let
and
such
that ![]()
We have
to show that ![]()
Let
which
is equivalent to
It
follows that there is a mapping
(
and
such
that ![]()
Let
,
which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that ![]()
It follows that
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Let
and
such
that ![]()
We
have to show that ![]()
Let
which
is equivalent to
It
follows that there is a mapping
(
and
such
that ![]()
and
![]()
Let
and
such
that ![]()
We
have to show that ![]()
Let
which
is equivalent to
It
follows that there is a mapping
(
and
such
that ![]()
Since we know that
![]()
![]()
![]()
we get that there exists
![]()
![]()
![]()
such that
![]()
![]()
![]()
Then the multivalued operators
![]()
![]()
![]()
where
and
![]()
and
![]()
and
![]()
have nonempty values and are measurable.
By
Kuratowski and Ryll Nardzewski’selection theorem there exist
,
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
We make the following estimation
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Taking
the
we get
that
![]()
In a similar way we get that
![]()
and
![]()
We show now that
![]()
i.e.
![]()
which
is equivalent to, for each
there
is an element
and
![]()
and
![]()
which
is equivalent to, for each
and
there
is an element
and
Let
, which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that ![]()
It follows that
![]()
Let
such
that
We
have that
![]()
Let
, which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that ![]()
It follows that
![]()
Let
such
that
We
have that
![]()
Let
, which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that ![]()
It follows that
![]()
Let
such
that
We
have that
![]()
Thus, all the assumptions of Theorem 4 are satisfied. The conclusion follows by Theorem 4.
Next we give an example in support of our Theorem 4.
Example
1 Let
be a
generalized Banach space and
![]()
![]()
![]()
then
![]()
![]()
![]()
gives

Also
all the conditions of Theorem 4 satisfy and system 2.1 has unique solution ![]()
Example 2
Let
be a
generalized Banach space. Consider the system of integral equation 3.1. We take
and
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
then
![]()
![]()
![]()
gives

Also
all the conditions of Theorem 4 satisfied and provided a unique solution
of
system 3.1 .
REFERENCES:
1. R.P. Agarwal, Contraction and approximate contraction with an application to multi-point boundary value problems, J. Comput. Applied Math., 9 (1983), 315-325.
2. R. P. Agarwal, D. O’Regan and M. A. Taoudi, Browder- Krasnoselskii type fixed point theorem in Banach space, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010 (2010), Article ID 243716, doi:10.1155/2010/243716.
3. G. Allaire and S. M. Kaber, Numerical Linear Algebra, Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 55, Springer, New York, 2008.
4. A. Bucur, L. Guran, A. Petruşel, Fixed points for multivalued operators on a set endowed with vector-valued metrics and applications, Fixed Point Theory, 10 (2009), no.1, 19-34.
5. T. A. Burton, A fixed-point theorem of Krasnoselskii, Appl. Math. Lett. 11 (1998) 85–88.
6. T. A. Burton and I. K. Purnaras, A Unification theory of Krasnoselskii for differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. 89 (2013), 121-133.
7. A.D. Filip, A. Petruşel, Fixed point theorems on spaces endowed with vector-valued metrics, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 281381, 15 pages, 2009.
8. M. A. Krasnoselskii, Two remarks on the method of successive approximations, Uspehi Math. Nauk 10 (1955), 123- 127.
9. M. A. Krasnoselskii, Topological Methods in the Theory of Nonlinear Integral Equations, Pergamon Press, New York, 1964.
10. S.B. Nadler, Multivalued contraction mappings, Pacific J. Math., 30 (1969), 475-488.
11. D. O’Regan, Fixed point theory for the sum of two operators, Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (1996), 1-8.
12. D. O’Regan, N. Shahzad, R.P. Agarwal, Fixed point theory for generalized contractive maps on spaces with vector-valued metrics, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 6, Nova Sci. Publ., New York, 2007, 143-149.
13. S. Park, Generalizations of the Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem, Nonlinear Anal. 67 (2007), 3401-3410.
14. A. I. Perov, On the Cauchy problem for a system of ordinary differential equations, Pviblizhen. Met. Reshen. Differ. Uravn., 2 (1964), 115-134.
15. A. I. Perov, A.V. Kibenko, On a certain general method for investigation of boundary value problems, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 30 (1966), 249-264 (in Russian).
16. I. R. Petre, A. Petruşel, Krasnoselskii’s theorem in generalized Banach spaces and applications, Electronic J. Qualitative Theory Diff. Equ., 85 (2012), 1-20.
17. A. Petruşel, Multivalued weakly Picard operators and applications, Sci. Math. Japon., 59 (2004), 169-202.
18. R. Precup, The role of matrices that are convergent to zero in the study of semilinear operator systems, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 703-708.
19. R. Precup, A. Viorel, Existence results for systems of nonlinear evolution equations, Intern. J. Pure Appl. Math., 47 (2008), no.2, 199-206.
20. R. Precup, A. Viorel, Existence results for systems of nonlinear evolution inclusions, Fixed Point Theory, 11 (2010), no.2, 337-346.
21. Sh. Rezapour, P. Amiri, Some fixed point results for multivalued operators in generalized metric spaces, Computers and Math. with Appl., 61 (2011), 2661-2666.
22. I. A. Rus, Principles and Applications of the Fixed Point Theory (in Romanian), Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1979.
23. I. A. Rus, A. Petrusel, G. Petrusel, Fixed Point Theory, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2008.
24. H. Schaeffer, Uber die Methode der a priori- Schranken, Math. Ann., 129 (1955), pp. 415-416.
25. S. P. Singh, Fixed point theorems for a sum of nonlinear operators, Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei 54 (1973), 1-4.
26. D. R. Smart, Fixed Point Theorems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.
27. R.S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Analysis, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 27, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
28. A. Viorel, Contributions to the study of nonlinear evolution equations, Ph.D. Thesis, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 2011.
29. A. C. Zaanen, Riesz Spaces, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Vol. 2, 1983.
30. E. Zeidler, Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications, I. Fixed- point theorems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
|
Received on 25.06.2019 Modified on 10.07.2019 Accepted on 31.07.2019 ©A&V Publications All right reserved Research J. Science and Tech. 2019; 11(3):186-200. DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2019.00029.9 |
|