Dr. Ch. Shashi Kumar1, Dr. B. Rami Reddy2, Dr. N. Phani Kumar3
1Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Deshmukhi, India- 508284.
2Hindu College, Guntur, India - 522033.
3Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Deshmukhi, India-508224
*Corresponding Author E-mail skch17@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The purpose of this paper is to present some existence results of Krasnoselskii type in generalized Banach spaces for multivalued operators. We provide also an application to a Fredholm-Volterra type integral inclusions system and gives an example in support of our main result. 47H10, 54H25, 34B15 fixed point, generalized contraction multivalued operator, integral inclusion, Krasnoselskii’s theorem.
KEY WORDS: Krasnoselskii Theorem, Fredholm-Volterra.
Let
be a
nonempty set. A mapping
is
called a vector-valued metric on
if the
following properties are satisfied:
(a) for
all
; if
, then
;
(b) for
all
;
(c) for
all
.
A set
endowed with a vector-valued metric is
called generalized metric space. The notions of convergent sequence, Cauchy
sequence, completeness, open subset and closed subset are similar to those for
usual metric spaces.
We
denote by the
set of all
matrices
with positive elements and by
the
identity
matrix.
If
,
and
, then,
by definition:
Notice
that we will make an identification between row and column vectors in .
Let be a
generalized metric space in Perov’s sense. For
with
for
each
, we
denote by
the
open ball centered in with
radius
and by
the
closed ball centered in with
radius
.
For the proof of the main results we need the following theorems.
Theorem
1 Let
. The
following assertions are equivalents:
(i) is
convergent towards zero;
(ii) as
;
(iii) The
eigenvalues of are
in the open unit disc, i.e
, for
every
with
;
(iv) The
matrix is
nonsingular and
(1.1)
(v) The
matrix is
nonsingular and
has
nonnegative
elements;
(vi) and
as
, for
each
.
Definition
1 ([29])
Let be a
generalized metric space. A subset
of
is
called compact if every open cover of
has a
finite subcover. A set
of a
topological space is said to be relatively compact if its closure is compact.
Definition
2 ([23])
Let be two
normed generalized spaces,
and
an
operator. Then
is
called:
i)
compact, if for any bounded subset we
have that
is
relatively compact (or equivalently
is
compact);
ii)
complete continuous, if is
continuous and compact;
iii)
with relatively compact range, if is
continuous and
is
relatively compact.
For the
case of multivalued operators in a generalized metric space we
recall some notions.
If is a
multivalued operator then
is the
fixed point set of the operator .
Let us
consider now the following sets of subsets of a metric space :
If is a
normed space, then we denote:
Let ( be a
metric space and we define now the following generalized functionals:
(1)
where is
called the gap functional between
and
In
particular, (where
) is
called the distance from the point
to the
set
(2)
In
particular is the
diameter of set
(3)
where is
called the excess functional of
over
.
(4)
where is
called the generalized Pompeiu-Hausdorff functional of
and
If is a
generalized metric space with
,
defined as
then we
denote by the
generalized gap functional on
We will
denote by the
Pompeiu-Hausdorff functional, generated by
, for
We
define as
The following lemma is well-known, see for example S. B. Nadler [10].
Lemma 1
Let
be a
metric space,
and
Then
for every
, there
exists
such
that
We have the following extension.
Lemma 2
Let
be a
generalized metric space,
and
Then
for each
, there
exists
such
that
Lemma 3
Let
We
suppose that there exists
such
that
(i) for
each there
is
such
that
(ii)
for each there
is
such
that
Then
If is a
generalized metric space, with
, then
for
, we
will denote by
the
closure of
with
respect to
.
In this
framework, a set is
said to be closed if and only if
Thus,
a set
is
closed if and only if for any convergent (with respect to
)
sequence
its
limit belongs to
.
We will
denote by the
set of all nonempty and closed (with respect to
)
subsets of
.
Lemma 4
Let
and
. Then
iff
Definition
3 ([4])
Let be a
generalized metric space,
and
be a
multivalued operator. Then,
is
called a multivalued
contraction
in the sense of Nadler if and only if
is a
matrix convergent to zero and
If are
two generalized metric spaces, we recall that a multivalued operator
is
said to be:
lower
semicontinuos (briefly l.s.c.) in if and
only if for any open
such
that
, there
exists a neighborhood
for
such
that for any
, we
have that
Theorem
2 ([28])
Let be a
generalized Banach space,
a
nonempty closed bounded convex subset of
and
such
that:
(i) with
completely
continuous and
a
generalized contraction, i.e. there exists a matrix
convergent to zero, such that
for all
;
(ii) for
all
.
Then has at
least one fixed point in
.
Theorem
3 ([16])
Let be a
generalized Banach space and
.
Assume that the operators
,
satisfy
the properties:
(i) , for
each
;
(ii) is a
multivalued
contraction
mapping in Nadler’s sense
(iii) is
l.s.c. and
is
relatively compact.
Then has a
fixed point in
In this section we will prove Krasnoselskii’s type fixed point theorems in
generalized Banach spaces for multivalued operators.
Let’s consider the following system of operatorial inclusions:
(2.1)
where ,
,
,
,
,
,
such
that
for each
We define
and
where and
.
The system (2.1) is equivalent to
where
and
.
Theorem
4 Let
be a
generalized Banach space,
and
,
,
,
,
,
,
satisfy
the following conditions:
(i)
for
each
(ii) ,
are
l.s.c and
, for
all
are
relatively compact;
(iii)
where is
convergent to zero.
Then there exists at least one solution for the system (2.1).
Proof. We
apply the fixed point theorem of Krasnoselskii for multivalued operators to the
space ,
endowed with the vector valued norm
defined
by
The
operator is
l.s.c. This follows from the fact that
,
and
are
l.s.c. From condition (ii) we obtain that
is
relatively compact, where
.
We have
to show that the operator and
are
-
contraction (multivalued
-
contraction in Nadler’s sense). Using the assumption (iii) we get that
and
or equivalently,
for
Thus is a
multivalued
-
contraction in Nadler’s sense.
The invariance condition is satisfied since
and
which guarantee that
Thus we have that
and
or equivalentely
Thus
Theorem 3 applies and guarantees the existence in of at
least one fixed point for
.
The aim of this section is to present an application of Krasnoselskii’s type fixed point theorem in generalized Banach spaces for a system of integral inclusions.
Theorem
5 Let
(with
) be an
interval of the real axis and consider the following system of integral
equations:
(3.1)
for , where
, for
We assume that:
(i) ,
,
,
,
and
are
l.s.c. and integrably bounded.
(ii) ,
and
are
measurable and integrably bounded.
(iii)
there exists a matrix
for
each
(iv)
(v)
with
Then,
there exists such
that the system (3.1) has at least one solution
Proof. Let us
denote ,
,
and
we
define the multivalued operators given by
where
where
where
where
where
where
where
where
where The
system (3.1) can be rewritten as a fixed point equation of the following form
where
and
where
Obviously
is a
solution for our integral inclusions system if and only if is a fixed point for
the operator
We need
to show that the multivalued operators ,
satisfy
the assumptions of Theorem 4. We shall prove that
and
are
multivalued
-
contractions in Nadler’s sense.
Let’s
denote
,
and
Then and
It
follows that there are the operators the
integrable selections for
,
and
such
that
Since
and
we obtain that there exists
such that
Then
the multivalued operators defined
by
where and
and
and
have nonempty values and are measurable.
Let be
three integrable selections for
,
and
. Then
and
Let’s
define ,
and
It
follows that ,
,
and
denotes
the Bielecki-type norm on the generalized Banach space
We obtain that
In a similar way we get that
and
These inequalities can be rewritten in a vectorial form
We get that
where
Taking large
enough it follows that the matrix
is
convergent to zero, and thus
and
are
multivalued contractions in Nadler’s sense. By Covitz- Nadler fixed point
theorem we get that
is a
fixed point for
Let with
The
operators and
are
l.s.c. and
,
and
are
relatively compact.
We
show that we can choose , such
that
We have to prove that
We have
to show that for each implies
that
and
for each
and
implies
that
and
Let , which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that
We will
denote by the
supremum norm in
, where
It follows that
and
Let and
such
that
We have
to show that
Let which
is equivalent to
It
follows that there is a mapping
(
and
such
that
Let ,
which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that
It follows that
Let and
such
that
We
have to show that
Let which
is equivalent to
It
follows that there is a mapping
(
and
such
that
and
Let and
such
that
We
have to show that
Let which
is equivalent to
It
follows that there is a mapping
(
and
such
that
Since we know that
we get that there exists
such that
Then the multivalued operators
where and
and
and
have nonempty values and are measurable.
By
Kuratowski and Ryll Nardzewski’selection theorem there exist ,
and
We make the following estimation
Taking
the we get
that
In a similar way we get that
and
We show now that
i.e.
which
is equivalent to, for each there
is an element
and
and
which
is equivalent to, for each and
there
is an element
and
Let , which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that
It follows that
Let such
that
We
have that
Let , which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that
It follows that
Let such
that
We
have that
Let , which
is equivalent to the fact that there exist
,
and
such
that
It follows that
Let such
that
We
have that
Thus, all the assumptions of Theorem 4 are satisfied. The conclusion follows by Theorem 4.
Next we give an example in support of our Theorem 4.
Example
1 Let
be a
generalized Banach space and
then
gives
Also
all the conditions of Theorem 4 satisfy and system 2.1 has unique solution
Example 2
Let be a
generalized Banach space. Consider the system of integral equation 3.1. We take
and
then
gives
Also
all the conditions of Theorem 4 satisfied and provided a unique solution of
system 3.1 .
REFERENCES:
1. R.P. Agarwal, Contraction and approximate contraction with an application to multi-point boundary value problems, J. Comput. Applied Math., 9 (1983), 315-325.
2. R. P. Agarwal, D. O’Regan and M. A. Taoudi, Browder- Krasnoselskii type fixed point theorem in Banach space, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010 (2010), Article ID 243716, doi:10.1155/2010/243716.
3. G. Allaire and S. M. Kaber, Numerical Linear Algebra, Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 55, Springer, New York, 2008.
4. A. Bucur, L. Guran, A. Petruşel, Fixed points for multivalued operators on a set endowed with vector-valued metrics and applications, Fixed Point Theory, 10 (2009), no.1, 19-34.
5. T. A. Burton, A fixed-point theorem of Krasnoselskii, Appl. Math. Lett. 11 (1998) 85–88.
6. T. A. Burton and I. K. Purnaras, A Unification theory of Krasnoselskii for differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. 89 (2013), 121-133.
7. A.D. Filip, A. Petruşel, Fixed point theorems on spaces endowed with vector-valued metrics, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 281381, 15 pages, 2009.
8. M. A. Krasnoselskii, Two remarks on the method of successive approximations, Uspehi Math. Nauk 10 (1955), 123- 127.
9. M. A. Krasnoselskii, Topological Methods in the Theory of Nonlinear Integral Equations, Pergamon Press, New York, 1964.
10. S.B. Nadler, Multivalued contraction mappings, Pacific J. Math., 30 (1969), 475-488.
11. D. O’Regan, Fixed point theory for the sum of two operators, Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (1996), 1-8.
12. D. O’Regan, N. Shahzad, R.P. Agarwal, Fixed point theory for generalized contractive maps on spaces with vector-valued metrics, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 6, Nova Sci. Publ., New York, 2007, 143-149.
13. S. Park, Generalizations of the Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem, Nonlinear Anal. 67 (2007), 3401-3410.
14. A. I. Perov, On the Cauchy problem for a system of ordinary differential equations, Pviblizhen. Met. Reshen. Differ. Uravn., 2 (1964), 115-134.
15. A. I. Perov, A.V. Kibenko, On a certain general method for investigation of boundary value problems, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 30 (1966), 249-264 (in Russian).
16. I. R. Petre, A. Petruşel, Krasnoselskii’s theorem in generalized Banach spaces and applications, Electronic J. Qualitative Theory Diff. Equ., 85 (2012), 1-20.
17. A. Petruşel, Multivalued weakly Picard operators and applications, Sci. Math. Japon., 59 (2004), 169-202.
18. R. Precup, The role of matrices that are convergent to zero in the study of semilinear operator systems, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 703-708.
19. R. Precup, A. Viorel, Existence results for systems of nonlinear evolution equations, Intern. J. Pure Appl. Math., 47 (2008), no.2, 199-206.
20. R. Precup, A. Viorel, Existence results for systems of nonlinear evolution inclusions, Fixed Point Theory, 11 (2010), no.2, 337-346.
21. Sh. Rezapour, P. Amiri, Some fixed point results for multivalued operators in generalized metric spaces, Computers and Math. with Appl., 61 (2011), 2661-2666.
22. I. A. Rus, Principles and Applications of the Fixed Point Theory (in Romanian), Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1979.
23. I. A. Rus, A. Petrusel, G. Petrusel, Fixed Point Theory, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2008.
24. H. Schaeffer, Uber die Methode der a priori- Schranken, Math. Ann., 129 (1955), pp. 415-416.
25. S. P. Singh, Fixed point theorems for a sum of nonlinear operators, Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei 54 (1973), 1-4.
26. D. R. Smart, Fixed Point Theorems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.
27. R.S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Analysis, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 27, Springer, Berlin, 2000.
28. A. Viorel, Contributions to the study of nonlinear evolution equations, Ph.D. Thesis, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 2011.
29. A. C. Zaanen, Riesz Spaces, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Vol. 2, 1983.
30. E. Zeidler, Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications, I. Fixed- point theorems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.
Received on 25.06.2019 Modified on 10.07.2019 Accepted on 31.07.2019 ©A&V Publications All right reserved Research J. Science and Tech. 2019; 11(3):186-200. DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2019.00029.9 |
|