Application of Krasnoselskii Theorem for Multivalued Operators

 

Dr. Ch. Shashi Kumar1, Dr. B. Rami Reddy2, Dr. N. Phani Kumar3

1Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Deshmukhi, India- 508284.

2Hindu College, Guntur, India - 522033.

3Vignan Institute of Technology & Science, Deshmukhi, India-508224

*Corresponding Author E-mail skch17@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The purpose of this paper is to present some existence results of Krasnoselskii type in generalized Banach spaces for multivalued operators. We provide also an application to a Fredholm-Volterra type integral inclusions system and gives an example in support of our main result. 47H10, 54H25, 34B15 fixed point, generalized contraction multivalued operator, integral inclusion, Krasnoselskii’s theorem.

 

KEY WORDS: Krasnoselskii Theorem, Fredholm-Volterra.

 

 

1. INTRODUCTION:

Let  be a nonempty set. A mapping  is called a vector-valued metric on  if the following properties are satisfied:

(a)  for all ; if , then ;

(b)  for all ;

(c)  for all .

A set endowed with a vector-valued metric  is called generalized metric space. The notions of convergent sequence, Cauchy sequence, completeness, open subset and closed subset are similar to those for usual metric spaces.

We denote by  the set of all  matrices with positive elements and by  the identity  matrix. If ,  and , then, by definition:

                                                                  

Notice that we will make an identification between row and column vectors in .

Let  be a generalized metric space in Perov’s sense. For  with  for each , we denote by

                                                                            

 

the open ball centered in  with radius  and by

                                                                            

 

the closed ball centered in  with radius .

For the proof of the main results we need the following theorems.

 

Theorem 1 Let  . The following assertions are equivalents:

(i)  is convergent towards zero;

(ii)  as ;

(iii) The eigenvalues of  are in the open unit disc, i.e , for every

 with ;

(iv) The matrix  is nonsingular and

                                                                                                                                               (1.1)

 

(v) The matrix  is nonsingular and  has nonnegative

elements;

(vi)  and  as , for each  .

 

Definition 1 ([29]) Let  be a generalized metric space. A subset  of  is called compact if every open cover of  has a finite subcover. A set  of a topological space is said to be relatively compact if its closure is compact.

 

Definition 2 ([23]) Let  be two normed generalized spaces,  and  an operator. Then  is called:

i) compact, if for any bounded subset  we have that  is relatively compact (or equivalently  is compact);

ii) complete continuous, if  is continuous and compact;

iii) with relatively compact range, if  is continuous and  is relatively compact.

 

For the case of multivalued operators in a generalized metric space  we recall some notions.

If  is a multivalued operator then

                                                                               

 

is the fixed point set of the operator .

Let us consider now the following sets of subsets of a metric space :

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

 

If  is a normed space, then we denote:

                                

                                

 

Let ( be a metric space and we define now the following generalized functionals:

(1)

                                                           

 

where  is called the gap functional between  and

In particular,  (where ) is called the distance from the point  to the set

(2)

                                                           

 

In particular  is the diameter of set

(3)

                                                                 

 

where  is called the excess functional of  over .

(4)

                                                              

where  is called the generalized Pompeiu-Hausdorff functional of  and

If  is a generalized metric space with , defined as

                                                                                     

 

then we denote by the generalized gap functional on

We will denote by  the Pompeiu-Hausdorff functional, generated by , for

We define  as

                                                                                  

The following lemma is well-known, see for example S. B. Nadler [10].

 

Lemma 1 Let  be a metric space,  and   Then for every , there exists  such that  

 

We have the following extension.

 

Lemma 2 Let  be a generalized metric space,  and   Then for each , there exists  such that

                                                                                        

 

Lemma 3 Let  We suppose that there exists  such that

(i) for each  there is  such that

(ii) for each  there is  such that

Then  

 

If  is a generalized metric space, with , then for , we will denote by  the closure of  with respect to .

In this framework, a set  is said to be closed if and only if  Thus, a set  is closed if and only if for any convergent (with respect to ) sequence  its limit belongs to .

We will denote by  the set of all nonempty and closed (with respect to ) subsets of .

 

Lemma 4 Let  and . Then  iff  

 

Definition 3 ([4]) Let  be a generalized metric space,  and  be a multivalued operator. Then,  is called a multivalued contraction in the sense of Nadler if and only if  is a matrix convergent to zero and

                                                                   

If  are two generalized metric spaces, we recall that a multivalued operator  is said to be:

lower semicontinuos (briefly l.s.c.) in  if and only if for any open  such that , there exists a neighborhood  for  such that for any , we have that

 

Theorem 2 ([28]) Let  be a generalized Banach space,  a nonempty closed bounded convex subset of  and  such that:

(i)  with  completely continuous and

a generalized contraction, i.e. there exists a matrix

convergent to zero, such that

                                                                               

 

for all ;

(ii)  for all .

Then  has at least one fixed point in .

 

Theorem 3 ([16])  Let  be a generalized Banach space and . Assume that the operators ,  satisfy the properties:

(i) , for each ;

(ii)  is a multivalued contraction mapping in Nadler’s sense

(iii)  is l.s.c. and  is relatively compact.

Then  has a fixed point in  

 

Existence results for a system of operatorial inclusions

 

In this section we will prove Krasnoselskii’s type fixed point theorems in

generalized Banach spaces for multivalued operators.

Let’s consider the following system of operatorial inclusions:

                                                                                                                             (2.1)

 

where , ,

, , , ,  such

that for each

                                

                                

                                

 

We define

                                                                                 

 

                                                                                 

and

                                                                                  

 

where  and .

The system (2.1) is equivalent to

                                                                                    

 

where   and .

 

Theorem 4 Let  be a generalized Banach space,  and , ,

, , , ,  satisfy the following conditions:

(i)    for each

(ii) , are l.s.c and , for all  are relatively compact;

(iii)

                                

                                

                                

 

where  is convergent to zero.

 Then there exists at least one solution for the system (2.1).

 

 

Proof. We apply the fixed point theorem of Krasnoselskii for multivalued operators to the space , endowed with the vector valued norm  defined by

                                                                                     

The operator  is l.s.c. This follows from the fact that  , and  are l.s.c. From condition (ii) we obtain that  is relatively compact, where .

We have to show that the operator  and  are - contraction (multivalued - contraction in Nadler’s sense). Using the assumption (iii) we get that

                                

                                

                                

 

and

 

                                

                                

                                

 or equivalently,

                                                                            

 

                                                                              

for

 Thus  is a multivalued - contraction in Nadler’s sense.

 

The invariance condition is satisfied since

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

and

                                

                                

                                

 which guarantee that

                                

                                

                                

Thus we have that

                                

                                

                                

and

                                                                           

or equivalentely

                                            

Thus Theorem 3 applies and guarantees the existence in  of at least one fixed point for .

 

3 Applications:

 

The aim of this section is to present an application of Krasnoselskii’s type fixed point theorem in generalized Banach spaces for a system of integral inclusions.

 

 

Theorem 5  Let  (with ) be an interval of the real axis and consider the following system of integral equations:

                                       (3.1)

 

for , where , for

We assume that:

(i) , , , ,  and  are l.s.c. and integrably bounded.

(ii) ,  and  are measurable and integrably bounded.

(iii) there exists a matrix

                                

                                

                                

 

for each

(iv)

                                

                                

                                

 

(v)

                                

                                

                                

 

 

                                

                                

                                

 

with

Then, there exists  such that the system (3.1) has at least one solution  

 

Proof. Let us denote , ,  and  we define the multivalued operators given by

                                 

 

where  

                                

 

where  

                                

 

where

 

                                 

 

 where  

                                

 

 where  

                                

 

 where

 

                                 

 

where  

                                

 

 where  

                                

 

where  The system (3.1) can be rewritten as a fixed point equation of the following form

                                                                                        

where

                                                                                  

 

                                                                                  

and

                                                                                  

where

                                

 

                                

 

                                

Obviously  is a solution for our integral inclusions system if and only if is a fixed point for the operator

We need to show that the multivalued operators , satisfy the assumptions of Theorem 4. We shall prove that  and  are multivalued - contractions in Nadler’s sense.

 

Let’s denote  ,   and

 Then  and

                                

                                

                                

It follows that there are the operators  the integrable selections for ,  and  such that

                                

                                

                                

Since

                       

 

                       

and

                       

we obtain that there exists

                                

                                

                                

such that

                                

                                

                                

Then the multivalued operators  defined by

                                

                                

                                

where  and

                                   

 and

                                   

 and

                                    

have nonempty values and are measurable.

 Let  be three integrable selections for , and . Then

                                

                                

                                

and

                                

                                

                                

Let’s define ,  and

 It follows that , ,  and

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

 denotes the Bielecki-type norm on the generalized Banach space

 We obtain that

                                         

In a similar way we get that

                                          

and

 

                                          

These inequalities can be rewritten in a vectorial form

                                

                                

We get that

                                                   

where

                                                                      

Taking  large enough it follows that the matrix  is convergent to zero, and thus  and  are multivalued contractions in Nadler’s sense. By Covitz- Nadler fixed point theorem we get that  is a fixed point for

 Let  with

 The operators  and  are l.s.c. and ,  and  are relatively compact.

 We show that we can choose , such that

                                    

 We have to prove that

                                

                                

                                

We have to show that for each  implies that  and for each  and  implies that  and  

 Let , which is equivalent to the fact that there exist ,  and  such that

 

We will denote by  the supremum norm in , where

It follows that

                                

                                

                                

and

                                                    

Let  and  such that

We have to show that

 Let  which is equivalent to  It follows that there is a mapping  (  and  such that

 

Let ,  which is equivalent to the fact that there exist ,  and  such that

 It follows that

                                

                                

                                

 

                                                

Let  and  such that

 We have to show that

 Let  which is equivalent to  It follows that there is a mapping (  and  such that

and

 

                                                

Let  and  such that

 We have to show that

 Let  which is equivalent to  It follows that there is a mapping (  and  such that

 Since we know that

                                

                                

                                

we get that there exists

                                

                                

                                

such that

 

                                

                                

                                

Then the multivalued operators

                                

                                

                                

where  and

                       

 and

                     

  and

                        

 

have nonempty values and are measurable.

 By Kuratowski and Ryll Nardzewski’selection theorem there exist ,   and

                                

                                

                                

We make the following estimation

 

                                

                                

                                

                                

                                

Taking the  we get that

           

In a similar way we get that

           

and

           

 

We show now that

                                      

i.e.

                                                                                

which is equivalent to, for each  there is an element  and

                                                                                

and

                                                                                

which is equivalent to, for each  and  there is an element  and  

 Let , which is equivalent to the fact that there exist ,  and  such that

 It follows that

                                                                    

Let such that  We have that

                                                       

Let , which is equivalent to the fact that there exist ,  and  such that

 It follows that

                                                                   

Let such that  We have that

                                                       

 

Let , which is equivalent to the fact that there exist ,  and  such that

It follows that

                                                                    

Let such that  We have that

                                                        

 

Thus, all the assumptions of Theorem 4 are satisfied. The conclusion follows by Theorem 4.

Next we give an example in support of our Theorem 4.

 

Example 1  Let  be a generalized Banach space and

 

                                

                                

                                

then

 

                                                                    

                                                                   

                                                                    

gives

                                                                                     

Also all the conditions of Theorem 4 satisfy and system 2.1 has unique solution

 

Example 2

Let  be a generalized Banach space. Consider the system of integral equation 3.1. We take  and

 

                                

                                

                                

 

                                

                                

                                

 

                                

                                

 

then

                                                                    

                                                                   

                                                                    

gives

Also all the conditions of Theorem 4 satisfied and provided a unique solution  of system 3.1 .

 

REFERENCES:

1.        R.P. Agarwal, Contraction and approximate contraction with an application to multi-point boundary value problems, J. Comput. Applied Math., 9 (1983), 315-325.

2.        R. P. Agarwal, D. O’Regan and M. A. Taoudi, Browder- Krasnoselskii type fixed point theorem in Banach space, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010 (2010), Article ID 243716, doi:10.1155/2010/243716.

3.        G. Allaire and S. M. Kaber, Numerical Linear Algebra, Texts in Applied Mathematics, vol. 55, Springer, New York, 2008.

4.        A. Bucur, L. Guran, A. Petruşel, Fixed points for multivalued operators on a set endowed with vector-valued metrics and applications, Fixed Point Theory, 10 (2009), no.1, 19-34.

5.        T. A. Burton, A fixed-point theorem of Krasnoselskii, Appl. Math. Lett. 11 (1998) 85–88.

6.        T. A. Burton and I. K. Purnaras, A Unification theory of Krasnoselskii for differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. 89 (2013), 121-133.

7.        A.D. Filip, A. Petruşel, Fixed point theorems on spaces endowed with vector-valued metrics, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, vol. 2010, Article ID 281381, 15 pages, 2009.

8.        M. A. Krasnoselskii, Two remarks on the method of successive approximations, Uspehi Math. Nauk 10 (1955), 123- 127.

9.        M. A. Krasnoselskii, Topological Methods in the Theory of Nonlinear Integral Equations, Pergamon Press, New York, 1964.

10.      S.B. Nadler, Multivalued contraction mappings, Pacific J. Math., 30 (1969), 475-488.

11.      D. O’Regan, Fixed point theory for the sum of two operators, Appl. Math. Lett. 9 (1996), 1-8.

12.      D. O’Regan, N. Shahzad, R.P. Agarwal, Fixed point theory for generalized contractive maps on spaces with vector-valued metrics, Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Vol. 6, Nova Sci. Publ., New York, 2007, 143-149.

13.      S. Park, Generalizations of the Krasnoselskii’s fixed point theorem, Nonlinear Anal. 67 (2007), 3401-3410.

14.      A. I. Perov, On the Cauchy problem for a system of ordinary differential equations, Pviblizhen. Met. Reshen. Differ. Uravn., 2 (1964), 115-134.

15.      A. I. Perov, A.V. Kibenko, On a certain general method for investigation of boundary value problems, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 30 (1966), 249-264 (in Russian).

16.      I. R. Petre, A. Petruşel, Krasnoselskii’s theorem in generalized Banach spaces and applications, Electronic J. Qualitative Theory Diff. Equ., 85 (2012), 1-20.

17.      A. Petruşel, Multivalued weakly Picard operators and applications, Sci. Math. Japon., 59 (2004), 169-202.

18.      R. Precup, The role of matrices that are convergent to zero in the study of semilinear operator systems, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 703-708.

19.      R. Precup, A. Viorel, Existence results for systems of nonlinear evolution equations, Intern. J. Pure Appl. Math., 47 (2008), no.2, 199-206.

20.      R. Precup, A. Viorel, Existence results for systems of nonlinear evolution inclusions, Fixed Point Theory, 11 (2010), no.2, 337-346.

21.      Sh. Rezapour, P. Amiri, Some fixed point results for multivalued operators in generalized metric spaces, Computers and Math. with Appl., 61 (2011), 2661-2666.

22.      I. A. Rus, Principles and Applications of the Fixed Point Theory (in Romanian), Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, 1979.

23.      I. A. Rus, A. Petrusel, G. Petrusel, Fixed Point Theory, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca, 2008.

24.      H. Schaeffer, Uber die Methode der a priori- Schranken, Math. Ann., 129 (1955), pp. 415-416.

25.      S. P. Singh, Fixed point theorems for a sum of nonlinear operators, Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei 54 (1973), 1-4.

26.      D. R. Smart, Fixed Point Theorems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.

27.      R.S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Analysis, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Vol. 27, Springer, Berlin, 2000.

28.      A. Viorel, Contributions to the study of nonlinear evolution equations, Ph.D. Thesis, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, 2011.

29.      A. C. Zaanen, Riesz Spaces, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Vol. 2, 1983.

30.      E. Zeidler, Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications, I. Fixed- point theorems, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993.

 

Received on 25.06.2019       Modified on 10.07.2019

Accepted on 31.07.2019      ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech. 2019; 11(3):186-200.

DOI: 10.5958/2349-2988.2019.00029.9